Globally, the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) issued inaugural voluntary global sustainability disclosure standards in 2023. Multiple jurisdictions have expressed their intent to adopt these standards into national law, including Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Nigeria, Singapore, and the UK, among others.4
In the US, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s 2024 regulatory agenda includes the finalization of its promised climate disclosure regulation and updates to the names rule to include sustainable investing terms, as well as other ESG-related proposed rulemaking. In California, climate-related disclosure laws passed in 2023 begin taking effect this year, continuing through 2026.5 'Greenwashing,’ or a lack of transparency in sustainability reporting, continues to be a concern for both regulators and investors.
The volume of ESG and sustainable investment data continues to proliferate as reporting standards expand, making it difficult to manage efficiently.
Asset managers are the heaviest spenders on sustainable investment data, representing 59% of all buyers, followed by insurers and other institutional investors.7 Two years ago, institutional investors were spending an average of $1.3 MM annually just to collect, analyze and report climate data to inform their investment decisions.8
To obtain the different data sets they use, investors are relying on multiple data providers – a costly proposition that adds more contradictory, unstructured and fragmented data to the mix. Worse, it creates an even higher cost base, since in-house reconciliation and analysis is needed to rationalize and curate the data into a usable state.
With data that is often unstandardized and delivered in different formats – such as unconnected software applications, APIs and even spreadsheets – it is a daunting, resource intensive, and costly task.
Easily ingest data from multiple providers, including MSCI, Sustainalytics, ISS ESG, and more. ESG data cross-compatibility across providers is achieved through a consistent structure and common identifiers, enabling instantaneous joins across datasets.
Address inconsistencies or missing data that result from complex corporate hierarchy reporting, through management of company hierarchies, overrides and data propagation rules to estimate data for companies with gaps in sustainable investment data. This broadens the investable universe.
Support for extensive inclusion and exclusion criteria, allowing the creation of dynamic investment universes that align with institution specific sustainability mandates and aid portfolio construction for proprietary funds.
Eliminate the need for ad-hoc offline calculations. Normalized data within Fusion can be used to calculate custom sustainable investment metrics, immediately accessible for rules-based screening and hierarchy-based metrics propagation.
1. Mind the data gap, July 2023, ESG Book
2. Worldwide Impact of CSDR, are you ready? January 2024, and What US companies need to know about the EUs CSRD, PwC
3. ESG Trends 2024, February 2024, Wolters Kluwer
4. ESG Insights: 10 Things That Should Be Top of Mind in 2024, January 2024, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance
5. Ibid
6. ESG Trends 2024, February 2024, Wolters Kluwer
7. How ESG data markets have evolved for financial services, March 2023, EY
8. Survey reveals costs and benefits of climate-related disclosure for companies and investors, May 2022, ERM
Complete your access to Fusion or talk to our team about your data needs.