Extract maximum value from your sustainable investment data in minutes, not months.
ACCESS MORE INFORMATIONThe SI data landscape is fragmented and ever-changing. Dive into investors' common data challenges, and learn strategies to solve them using technology.
Fusion supports data cross-compatibility across providers. We have unified the format and added common identifiers, enabling instantaneous joins across datasets. This allows you to skip the data wrangling and immediately begin processing and analysis.
Manage your company hierarchies and data propagation rules to estimate data for companies with gaps in SI data. This enables you to broaden your investable universe.
Easily create and manage your investable universe inclusion and exclusion criteria. Run these screens on pre-defined schedules and access the results through Fusion’s comprehensive distribution channels.
You can use the normalized data within Fusion to calculate your own SI metrics with easy-to-use tools. These calculated metrics are automatically consistent with your internal SI data.
Hierarchy management and ESG metrics propagation: How to manage multiple custom corporate hierarchies with strong traceability
Access well-structured SI data in clean, optimized rows and columns, with the same identifiers, consistent across all sources.
No more data engineering and analyst work required for custom parsing, custom pipelines, identifier and hierarchy normalization, saving significant resources.
VIEW SAMPLE DATA
ESG providers typically send data in different formats, such as non-standard CSV, JSON, and more. Often the same dataset is distributed across multiple files, requiring teams to run joins across the files before creating a usable dataset.
Fusion takes this range of formats and normalizes them to best-in-class standards. All the data is converted into CSV and Parquet in a consistent format. Fusion strongly types the data, so a “string” is a “string” and a “date” is a “date”. When required, files are merged so that all the necessary data is combined in a single dataset with the relevant attributes.
Fusion follows modern standards of schema evolution to limit any breaking changes caused by adding new attributes.
Fusion supplements data from the ESG provider with a common set of company and instrument identifiers. Immediately join and compare ESG data across providers without any normalization effort.
Data providers use different instrument and company symbologies. Often this identifier coverage is insufficient. This makes it difficult for a data analyst to consistently normalize data.
Fusion maintains a master list of identifiers for companies and instruments. This list is reviewed and adjusted as new instruments are issued. Through this process, you can use any single common identifier to join data across providers easily.
A common practice in the ESG space is to proxy their metrics from another entity, including their parent entities. This may lead to double-counting if ESG metrics aggregation is done across the entire entity hierarchy.
Fusion helps to identify whether an entity is assessed on its own merit by using information available, which may be provided by the data provider or otherwise.
Instrument and company identifiers are constantly evolving either through new issuance or through mergers and acquisitions.
Fusion offers a continuous and proactive approach to identifying and correcting provider identifier inaccuracies and incompleteness when possible. Through this process Fusion significantly reduces errors associated with incorrect identifiers.
It is often challenging to find and map GICS® data to company ESG data, due to missing or incomplete identifiers.
Fusion enriches ESG datasets with GICS codes for each company, when you have a GICS license. This data enrichment within the ESG dataset allows you to immediately compare the ESG metrics of a company vs. its peers in the same industry. It also facilitates easy aggregation of ESG metrics within an industry.
When managing SI data, propagation of metrics across a company hierarchy is a common practice. However depending on the use case, the rules for hierarchy-based metric propagation vary.
Fusion provides a controlled framework to both manage different hierarchies and propagate metrics based on the appropriate hierarchy.
Fusion maintains a single comprehensive parent-issuer-instrument-trading venue hierarchy.
Seamlessly navigate through this hierarchy with the associated public identifiers, such as LEI and ISIN. Fusion facilitates supplemental identifier enrichment, such as vendor company identifiers or client’s internal identifiers.
The integrity of this hierarchy is always preserved and untouched by customized overrides.
Front-office desks, middle/back-office teams and external stakeholders require different corporate hierarchies. Typically, there is no-systematic way to support this.
Fusion provides a controlled process to create and manage independent hierarchies. These are easily managed through user-friendly overrides of the default hierarchy.
New parents can be defined from within or extend beyond an existing organizations hierarchy tree.
Flexibility to propagate ESG metrics through 2 different approaches:
• Based on the Fusion default hierarchy
• Based on custom defined hierarchies
Go one step further and specify rules for metric propagation. For example, only propagate metrics if the parent and subsidiary belong to the same GICS Industry.
Create rule-based inclusion and exclusion lists using pre-populated multi-vendor and internally calculated metrics.
Manage manual override lists through a controlled process.
Automatically combine rule-based and manual lists to create dynamic investment universes.
View and access these lists through a UI, API or Snowflake.
For your rule-based screens, use ESG metrics from multiple datasets – third-party data or internal, that have been pre- integrated into Fusion.
As ESG datasets are continuously added, new ESG metrics become available for use in screenings without additional data wrangling.
Pre-define your dates and times when your screenings should run to best suit your use cases.
For example, run the screens quarterly for regulatory reporting and weekly for front-office portfolio managers.
When setting up Screening criteria, decide which hierarchy, default or custom, should be used when propagating missing ESG metrics.